Menu
Help
Sign In

My Library

     
Limit search to available items
Book Cover
EBOOK
Title Feminist judgments [electronic resource] : health law rewritten / edited by Seema Mohapatra, Indiana University, Indianapolis; Lindsay Wiley, American University, Washington DC.
Publication Info. New York, NY : Cambridge University Press, 2022.

Location Call No. Status Notes
 Libraries Electronic Books  ELECTRONIC BOOK-Cambridge eBooks and Partner Presses: Full EBA, All eBooks    AVAIL. ONLINE
Description pages cm.
Series Cambridge eBooks and Partner Presses: Full EBA, All eBooks
Bibliography Includes bibliographical references and index.
Contents Introduction / Seema Mohapatra and Lindsay F. Wiley -- Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospitals, 105 N.E. 92, 93 (N.Y. 1914) / commentary, Danielle Pelfrey ; judgment, Kelly Dineen -- Reynolds v. McNichols, 488 F.2d 1378 (10th Cir. 1973) / commentary, Aziza Ahmed ; judgment, Wendy Parmet -- Conservatorship of Valerie N., 707 P.2d 760 (Cal. 1985) / commentary, Cynthia Soohoo and Sofia Yakren ; judgment, Doriane Lambelet Coleman -- Bouvia v. Superior Court, 225 Cal. Rptr. 297 (Cal Ct. App. 1986) / commentary, Joan H. Krause ; judgment, Barry Furrow -- Moore v. Regents of University of California, 793 P.2d 479 (Cal. 1990) / commentary, Jessica Roberts ; judgment, Lisa C. Ikemoto -- Linton v. Commissioner of Health and Environment, 65 F.3d 508 (6th Cir. 1995) / commentary, Ruqaiijah Yearby ; judgment, Gwendolyn Roberts Majette -- Olmstead v. L.C., 527 U.S. 581 (1999) / commentary, Doron Dorfman ; judgment, Becka Rich -- Doe v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Co., 179 F.3d 557 (7th Cir. 1999) / commentary, Christina S. Ho ; judgment, Valarie Blake -- Smith v. Rasmussen, 249 F.3d 755 (8th Cir. 2001) / commentary, Heather Walter McCabe ; judgment, Craig Konnoth -- Burton v. State, 49 So.3d 263 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010) / commentary, Greer Donley ; judgment, Nadia Sawicki -- National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebeliussiness v. Sebeliussiness v. Sebeliussiness v. Sebelius, 567 U.S. 519 (2012) / commentary, Mary Ann Chirba and Alice A. Noble ; judgment, Elizabeth Weeks -- Means v. United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, 836 F.3d 643 (6th Cir. 2016) / commentary, Maya Manian ; judgment, Leslie C. Griffin -- Does v. Gillespie, 867 F. 3d 1034 (8th Cir. 2017) / commentary, Elizabeth Kukura ; judgment, Jennifer Oliva and Melissa Alexander -- National Institute of Family & Life Advocates v. Becerra, 138 S.Ct. 2361 (2018) / commentary, Brietta R. Clark ; judgment, Sonia Suter.
Access License restrictions may limit access.
Summary "This book demonstrates how feminist analysis can transform law in a field where paternalism, individualism, gender stereotypes, and tensions over the public-private divide shape judicial decisions. Each chapter focuses on a single court decision related to health law. The decisions concern patient autonomy, informed consent, medical and nursing malpractice, the relationships among health care professionals and the institutions where they work, communications between health care providers and the patients they serve, end-of-life care, reproductive health care, biomedical research, ownership of human tissues and cells, the influence of religious directives on health care standards, health care discrimination, equitable access to long-term care in nursing homes, equitable access to community-based alternatives, private health insurance, Medicaid coverage, the Affordable Care Act, and more. Each chapter begins with a commentary from a scholar who puts the case in historical context, summarizes the original opinion, discusses what makes the rewritten opinion feminist, and describes how a feminist approach might have altered subsequent developments in health law. The feminist judgments take the form of rewritten majority opinions, concurrences, and dissents. The opinion authors are scholars who inhabit the role of a judge deciding the case. They rely exclusively on the factual record, precedents, and scientific understanding available at the time of the original decision to show how a judge with a feminist perspective could have adjudicated the matter differently"-- Provided by publisher.
Subject Medical care -- Law and legislation -- United States -- Cases.
Feminist jurisprudence -- United States.
Added Author Wiley, Lindsay F., 1977-
Mohapatra, Seema.
Cambridge eBooks and Partner Presses: Full EBA, All eBooks
Related To Online version: Mohapatra, Seema. Feminist judgments : health law rewritten New York, NY : Cambridge University Press, 2022 9781108860901 (DLC) 2022030484
ISBN 9781108495097 (hardback)
9781108816922 (paperback)
9781108860901 (epub)
OCLC # sseb_ssj0002738802
View Shelf for Similar Items